ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

[David Airlie]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk at oracle.com>
> To: "Jerome Glisse" <j.glisse at gmail.com>, dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org, "konrad wilk" <konrad.wilk at oracle.com>,
> thellstrom at vmware.com, airlied at gmail.com, "Jerome Glisse" <jglisse at redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, 2 December, 2011 2:19:01 PM
> Subject: Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7
> 
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When
> > > creating a
> > > ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that
> > > when
> > > ghost is release we don't overfree.
> > > 
> > > I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
> > > 
> > > Patch are also at
> > > 
> > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jerome
> > > 
> > 
> > Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on
> > fdo,
> > i don't resend to the ml.
> 
> Great! How should we ask Dave to pull them? Does he prefer to do it
> via git
> tree? In which I can create a branch with those patches and send him
> a GIT PULL
> email? Or is there a more convient way?

If someone could suck them all into a git tree + all the Reviewed-by tags from the people who reviewed them it would make it a lot easier,

I lost track of where this ended up as Jerome had a few balls in the air and I know Thomas wasn't liking some of them.

So please send me a git url and I'll go review that next week.

Dave.