[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: use helper functions for fence read/write

Alex Deucher alexdeucher at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 14:39:06 PDT 2011


The existing code assumed scratch registers in a number
of places while in most cases we are be using writeback
and events rather than scratch registers.

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c |   51 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
index bbcd1dd..ae1d1b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
@@ -40,6 +40,35 @@
 #include "radeon.h"
 #include "radeon_trace.h"
 
+static void radeon_fence_write(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 seq)
+{
+	if (rdev->wb.enabled) {
+		u32 scratch_index;
+		if (rdev->wb.use_event)
+			scratch_index = R600_WB_EVENT_OFFSET + rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg - rdev->scratch.reg_base;
+		else
+			scratch_index = RADEON_WB_SCRATCH_OFFSET + rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg - rdev->scratch.reg_base;
+		rdev->wb.wb[scratch_index/4] = cpu_to_le32(seq);;
+	} else
+		WREG32(rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg, seq);
+}
+
+static u32 radeon_fence_read(struct radeon_device *rdev)
+{
+	u32 seq;
+
+	if (rdev->wb.enabled) {
+		u32 scratch_index;
+		if (rdev->wb.use_event)
+			scratch_index = R600_WB_EVENT_OFFSET + rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg - rdev->scratch.reg_base;
+		else
+			scratch_index = RADEON_WB_SCRATCH_OFFSET + rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg - rdev->scratch.reg_base;
+		seq = le32_to_cpu(rdev->wb.wb[scratch_index/4]);
+	} else
+		seq = RREG32(rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg);
+	return seq;
+}
+
 int radeon_fence_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_fence *fence)
 {
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -50,12 +79,12 @@ int radeon_fence_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_fence *fence)
 		return 0;
 	}
 	fence->seq = atomic_add_return(1, &rdev->fence_drv.seq);
-	if (!rdev->cp.ready) {
+	if (!rdev->cp.ready)
 		/* FIXME: cp is not running assume everythings is done right
 		 * away
 		 */
-		WREG32(rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg, fence->seq);
-	} else
+		radeon_fence_write(rdev, fence->seq);
+	else
 		radeon_fence_ring_emit(rdev, fence);
 
 	trace_radeon_fence_emit(rdev->ddev, fence->seq);
@@ -73,15 +102,7 @@ static bool radeon_fence_poll_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 	bool wake = false;
 	unsigned long cjiffies;
 
-	if (rdev->wb.enabled) {
-		u32 scratch_index;
-		if (rdev->wb.use_event)
-			scratch_index = R600_WB_EVENT_OFFSET + rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg - rdev->scratch.reg_base;
-		else
-			scratch_index = RADEON_WB_SCRATCH_OFFSET + rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg - rdev->scratch.reg_base;
-		seq = le32_to_cpu(rdev->wb.wb[scratch_index/4]);
-	} else
-		seq = RREG32(rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg);
+	seq = radeon_fence_read(rdev);
 	if (seq != rdev->fence_drv.last_seq) {
 		rdev->fence_drv.last_seq = seq;
 		rdev->fence_drv.last_jiffies = jiffies;
@@ -251,7 +272,7 @@ retry:
 			r = radeon_gpu_reset(rdev);
 			if (r)
 				return r;
-			WREG32(rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg, fence->seq);
+			radeon_fence_write(rdev, fence->seq);
 			rdev->gpu_lockup = false;
 		}
 		timeout = RADEON_FENCE_JIFFIES_TIMEOUT;
@@ -351,7 +372,7 @@ int radeon_fence_driver_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 		write_unlock_irqrestore(&rdev->fence_drv.lock, irq_flags);
 		return r;
 	}
-	WREG32(rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg, 0);
+	radeon_fence_write(rdev, 0);
 	atomic_set(&rdev->fence_drv.seq, 0);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->fence_drv.created);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->fence_drv.emited);
@@ -391,7 +412,7 @@ static int radeon_debugfs_fence_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	struct radeon_fence *fence;
 
 	seq_printf(m, "Last signaled fence 0x%08X\n",
-		   RREG32(rdev->fence_drv.scratch_reg));
+		   radeon_fence_read(rdev));
 	if (!list_empty(&rdev->fence_drv.emited)) {
 		   fence = list_entry(rdev->fence_drv.emited.prev,
 				      struct radeon_fence, list);
-- 
1.7.1.1



More information about the dri-devel mailing list