[PATCH v2 4/5] DRI2: Expose API to set drawable swap limit.
Mario Kleiner
mario.kleiner at tuebingen.mpg.de
Thu Oct 6 09:07:55 PDT 2011
On Oct 6, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:31:00 +0200
> Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner at tuebingen.mpg.de> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>
>>> Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner at tuebingen.mpg.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 14, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:05:29 -0500, Jesse Barnes
>>>>> <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah thanks Mario, I blame Keith. :p I agree we should integrate
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> patch as it would allow us to do more fun stuff with swapping...
>>>>>
>>>>> That patch changes a ton of stuff; would be nice to see it split
>>>>> into
>>>>> smaller chunks that could be reviewed easily.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For reference, we're talking about this series, right?
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/xorg-devel@lists.x.org/msg14336.html>
>>>>
>>>> As far as i can see, they were already split up in chunks and
>>>> reviewed
>>>> by Jesse, me and Franzisco Jerez - assuming they still apply to
>>>> the
>>>> latest server version? At least 1/5, 4/5 and 5/5 looked simple
>>>> enough
>>>> and 4/5 and 5/5, the swaplimit api, seem to be independent from
>>>> the
>>>> rest of the series?
>>>>
>>> Note that my r-b only goes to 4/5, I had some objections to 5/5 and
>>> I'm
>>> not sure if 1/5-3/5 still make sense.
>>
>> I haven't checked if the rest still makes sense. 5/5 was about why a
>> driver who requests a dri2 swaplimit change should be called back to
>> confirm it is ok with the swaplimit change, which you said seems
>> totally redundant, right?
>>
>> Ok, so we talk specifically about 4/5, which was reviewed by all of
>> us, i think non-controversial, and a simple addition of a dri2
>> swaplimit api.
>>
>> Keith, what about that one for a start?
>>
>>> BTW, is there any reason this is being discussed outside of the
>>> mailing
>>> list?
>>
>> No. It just started as a private conversation with Jesse and
>> "drifted" into this. cc'ing dri-devel, all that was said is in this
>> mail.
>
> What's the latest here? I still think we need the swap limit API...
>
Keith has merged it as far as i saw. Thanks Keith!
-mario
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list