[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC 1/2] dma-buf: Introduce dma buffer sharing mechanism
robdclark at gmail.com
Wed Oct 12 07:24:56 PDT 2011
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But then we'd need a different set of accessors for every different
>> drm/v4l/etc driver, wouldn't we?
> Not any more different than you need for this, you just have a new
> interface that you request a sw object from,
> then mmap that object, and underneath it knows who owns it in the kernel.
oh, ok, so you are talking about a kernel level interface, rather than
but I guess in this case I don't quite see the difference. It amounts
to which fd you call mmap (or ioctl[*]) on.. If you use the dmabuf fd
directly then you don't have to pass around a 2nd fd.
[*] there is nothing stopping defining some dmabuf ioctls (such as for
synchronization).. although the thinking was to keep it simple for
first version of dmabuf
> mmap just feels wrong in this API, which is a buffer sharing API not a
> buffer mapping API.
>> I guess if sharing a buffer between multiple drm devices, there is
>> nothing stopping you from having some NOT_DMABUF_MMAPABLE flag you
>> pass when the buffer is allocated, then you don't have to support
>> dmabuf->mmap(), and instead mmap via device and use some sort of
>> DRM_CPU_PREP/FINI ioctls for synchronization..
> Or we could make a generic CPU accessor that we don't have to worry about.
More information about the dri-devel