Radeon regression fix
Brad Campbell
lists2009 at fnarfbargle.com
Thu Sep 29 22:14:56 PDT 2011
On 30/09/11 12:59, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Brad Campbell
>> Looking at it with a nights sleep, it's obvious the code path in
>> aux_native_write is ok. Is this a bit cleaner than the last patch?
>
> Looks pretty good. I was thinking of something more like this (sorry
> for the lack of a patch, I'm away from my source trees at the moment):
>
> while (1) {
> ret = radeon_process_aux_ch(dig_connector->dp_i2c_bus,
> msg, msg_bytes, recv, recv_bytes, delay,&ack);
>
> if (ret< 0)
> return ret;
> if ((ack& AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) == AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK)
> return ret;
> else if ((ack& AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) == AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER)
> udelay(400);
> else if (ret == 0)
> return -EPROTO;
> else
> return -EIO;
> }
Yep, that looks cleaner.
My only thought was the pre-3.0 code had a limit to the number of
retries. Was that for a specific reason or is it ok to attempt to retry
indefinitely if we receive a DEFER ?
>
> Thanks for tracking this down.
No worries. I learned quite a bit about some kernel internals and more
than a few quirks about apple hardware while muddling around.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list