[RESEND] An inquiry about DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4.

[Inki Dae]

Hi, Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airlied at gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 3:07 PM
> To: Inki Dae
> Cc: airlied at linux.ie; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org;
> kyungmin.park at samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [RESEND] An inquiry about DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4.
> 
> >
> > You can refer to these patches I sent from links below.
> > v1: < https://lwn.net/Articles/454380/ >
> > v2: < http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1224275.html >
> > v3: < http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg13755.html >
> > v4: < http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/60439 >
> > v5: < http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/60802 >
> >
> > and also you can refer to our working repository below.
> > < http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung > Branch name
:
> > dev/samsung-drm
> >
> > If there are any problems regarding our driver then please give me your
> > comments or advices so that we could  prepare next patch; otherwise we
> wish
> > our driver be applied to mainline.
> >
> 
> I'll probably give it one more review early next week, but I might
> merge it to -next, if I don't find anything seriously wrong.
> 

We would look forward to your comments. thank you.

> I still dislike the samsung_drm_ everywhere, just because no other
> driver does this, but if it helps with backtraces in the future maybe
> its okay.
> 

Ok, get it. we would consider using 'exynos' instead of 'samsung' seriously
if you don’t want 'samsung' prefix and then with your comments, the change
would be done on PATCH v6.

> Dave.

Thanks,
Inki Dae.