[PATCH] drm/edid: Try harder to fix up base EDID blocks

Alex Deucher alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 12:09:05 PDT 2012

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 4/16/12 10:40 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> Requiring the first byte of the EDID base block header to be 0 means we
>> don't fix up as many transfer errors as we could.  Instead have the
>> callers specify whether it's meant to be block 0 or not, and
>> conditionally run header fixup based on that.
> Anybody?  This appears to be a pretty common form of EDID corruption.

Seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>

> - ajax
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

More information about the dri-devel mailing list