[PATCH] drm/edid: Try harder to fix up base EDID blocks
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 12:09:05 PDT 2012
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 4/16/12 10:40 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> Requiring the first byte of the EDID base block header to be 0 means we
>> don't fix up as many transfer errors as we could. Instead have the
>> callers specify whether it's meant to be block 0 or not, and
>> conditionally run header fixup based on that.
> Anybody? This appears to be a pretty common form of EDID corruption.
Seems reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
> - ajax
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the dri-devel