[PATCH] vmwgfx: add missing mutex_unlocks
Thomas Hellstrom
thellstrom at vmware.com
Mon Aug 6 01:07:05 PDT 2012
NAK,
The mutex unlock is done in vmw_fifo_commit. The mutex is protecting the
fifo memory against multiple simultaneous reservers.
/Thomas
On 08/04/2012 07:33 AM, Devendra Naga wrote:
> we have done a proper mutex_unlock in the error cases of the vmw_fifo_reserve, but
> there are missing mutex unlocks where we return a valid pointer in vmw_fifo_reserve.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devendra Naga <develkernel412222 at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
> index a0c2f12..e3abd7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ void *vmw_fifo_reserve(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, uint32_t bytes)
> if (reserveable)
> iowrite32(bytes, fifo_mem +
> SVGA_FIFO_RESERVED);
> + mutex_unlock(&fifo_state->fifo_mutex);
> return fifo_mem + (next_cmd >> 2);
> } else {
> need_bounce = true;
> @@ -363,10 +364,12 @@ void *vmw_fifo_reserve(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, uint32_t bytes)
>
> if (need_bounce) {
> fifo_state->using_bounce_buffer = true;
> - if (bytes < fifo_state->static_buffer_size)
> + if (bytes < fifo_state->static_buffer_size) {
> + mutex_unlock(&fifo_state->fifo_mutex);
> return fifo_state->static_buffer;
> - else {
> + } else {
> fifo_state->dynamic_buffer = vmalloc(bytes);
> + mutex_unlock(&fifo_state->fifo_mutex);
> return fifo_state->dynamic_buffer;
> }
> }
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list