[PATCH] drm/ttm: remove EBUSY handling in ttm_execbuf_util

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Hey,

Op 20-08-12 17:15, Jerome Glisse schreef:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote:
>> How is this different from just calling with no_wait == false?
>> As far as I can tell, both paths end up with the same result..
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
> NAK this seriously modify the behavior. The ttm_eu_del_from_lru_locked
> part is important. It must happen with lru lock held and without any
> dropping of this lock prior to wait for bo unreserve.
>

You're right, I missed the part where it removed those, causing the later
patch to be wrong too. However I  still think the code can be made more
readable. Wouldn't it be better if it used the unlocked variants instead?
It would save a lot of extra list traversals, and you could drop
removed, reserved and put_count from ttm_validate_buffer.

~Maarten