[RFC PATCH 7/7] drm/pci: Defer initialization of secondary graphics devices until switcheroo is ready

Seth Forshee seth.forshee at canonical.com
Mon Aug 20 09:24:44 PDT 2012


On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:57:41PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:56:33AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:36:40PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Won't this break the multiple cards with independent outputs case?
> > 
> > Yes, if they don't have a switcheroo handler. I only have experience
> > with one such machine, which had optimus graphics. My recollection is
> > that it did have a switcheroo handler, which was only capable of
> > controlling power to the discrete card.
> 
> So if I have a desktop machine and install two graphics cards?

Yeah, that would likely be broken.

I'm not sure how we support both of these cases without doing something
more like what I originally proposed, i.e. registering the LVDS
connector even if it doesn't look like a panel is attached. I still
honestly favor that approach, although it does come with its own set of
challenges.

The only other option I can come up with is to reprobe LVDS after
switcheroo and add the connector at that time. I haven't investigated
this option in detail, but at first glance it looks like there are at
least some places where DRM isn't prepared to cope with adding
connectors after initialization.



More information about the dri-devel mailing list