[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/37] drm/i915: rework locking for intel_dpio|sbi_read|write
Jesse Barnes
jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org
Wed Dec 12 12:54:47 PST 2012
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:06:44 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Spinning for up to 200 us with interrupts locked out is not good. So
> let's just spin (and even that seems to be excessive).
>
> And we don't call these functions from interrupt context, so this is
> not required. Besides that doing anything in interrupt contexts which
> might take a few hundred us is a no-go. So just convert the entire
> thing to a mutex. Also move the mutex-grabbing out of the read/write
> functions (add a WARN_ON(!is_locked)) instead) since all callers are
> nicely grouped together.
>
> Finally the real motivation for this change: Dont grab the modeset
> mutex in the dpio debugfs file, we don't need that consistency. And
> correctness of the dpio interface is ensured with the dpio_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 53 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 58e6676..35d2ace 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1553,7 +1553,7 @@ static int i915_dpio_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ static int i915_dpio_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> seq_printf(m, "DPIO_FASTCLK_DISABLE: 0x%08x\n",
> intel_dpio_read(dev_priv, DPIO_FASTCLK_DISABLE));
>
> - mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index 2635ee6..ad488f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
> spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->error_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
> - spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
> + mutex_init(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
>
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index e2944e9..6fa0c00 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
> spinlock_t irq_lock;
>
> /* DPIO indirect register protection */
> - spinlock_t dpio_lock;
> + struct mutex dpio_lock;
>
> /** Cached value of IMR to avoid reads in updating the bitfield */
> u32 pipestat[2];
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index d303f2a..a0d8869 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -416,13 +416,11 @@ static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_vlv_dp = {
>
> u32 intel_dpio_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> - u32 val = 0;
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100)) {
> DRM_ERROR("DPIO idle wait timed out\n");
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> I915_WRITE(DPIO_REG, reg);
> @@ -430,24 +428,20 @@ u32 intel_dpio_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg)
> DPIO_BYTE);
> if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100)) {
> DRM_ERROR("DPIO read wait timed out\n");
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return 0;
> }
> - val = I915_READ(DPIO_DATA);
>
> -out_unlock:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> - return val;
> + return I915_READ(DPIO_DATA);
> }
>
> static void intel_dpio_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg,
> u32 val)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100)) {
> DRM_ERROR("DPIO idle wait timed out\n");
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return;
> }
>
> I915_WRITE(DPIO_DATA, val);
> @@ -456,9 +450,6 @@ static void intel_dpio_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg,
> DPIO_BYTE);
> if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100))
> DRM_ERROR("DPIO write wait timed out\n");
> -
> -out_unlock:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> }
>
> static void vlv_init_dpio(struct drm_device *dev)
> @@ -1455,13 +1446,12 @@ static void intel_disable_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
> static void
> intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg, u32 value)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_BUSY) == 0,
> 100)) {
> DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to become ready\n");
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return;
> }
>
> I915_WRITE(SBI_ADDR,
> @@ -1475,24 +1465,19 @@ intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg, u32 value)
> if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL)) == 0,
> 100)) {
> DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to complete write transaction\n");
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return;
> }
> -
> -out_unlock:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> }
>
> static u32
> intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> - u32 value = 0;
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_BUSY) == 0,
> 100)) {
> DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to become ready\n");
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> I915_WRITE(SBI_ADDR,
> @@ -1504,14 +1489,10 @@ intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg)
> if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL)) == 0,
> 100)) {
> DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to complete read transaction\n");
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> - value = I915_READ(SBI_DATA);
> -
> -out_unlock:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
> - return value;
> + return I915_READ(SBI_DATA);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2960,6 +2941,8 @@ static void lpt_program_iclkip(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> u32 divsel, phaseinc, auxdiv, phasedir = 0;
> u32 temp;
>
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
> +
> /* It is necessary to ungate the pixclk gate prior to programming
> * the divisors, and gate it back when it is done.
> */
> @@ -3041,6 +3024,8 @@ static void lpt_program_iclkip(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> udelay(24);
>
> I915_WRITE(PIXCLK_GATE, PIXCLK_GATE_UNGATE);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -4268,6 +4253,8 @@ static void vlv_update_pll(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> bool is_sdvo;
> u32 temp;
>
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
> +
> is_sdvo = intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_SDVO) ||
> intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI);
>
> @@ -4351,6 +4338,8 @@ static void vlv_update_pll(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> temp |= (1 << 21);
> intel_dpio_write(dev_priv, DPIO_DATA_CHANNEL2, temp);
> }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
> }
>
> static void i9xx_update_pll(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
Looks fine, I guess you could convert the wait_for_atomic_us to the
non-atomic variant now that you have a mutex. Either way:
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list