[PATCH 1/3] drm: Export routines for inserting preallocated nodes into the mm manager

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:37:06PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Required by i915 in order to avoid the allocation in the middle of
> manipulating the drm_mm lists.
> 
> Use a pair of stubs to preserve the existing EXPORT_SYMBOLs for
> backporting; to be removed later.
> 
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  include/drm/drm_mm.h     |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> index 0761a03..d93dc05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> @@ -184,19 +184,27 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mm_get_block_generic);
>   * -ENOSPC if no suitable free area is available. The preallocated memory node
>   * must be cleared.
>   */
> -int drm_mm_insert_node(struct drm_mm *mm, struct drm_mm_node *node,
> -		       unsigned long size, unsigned alignment)
> +int drm_mm_insert_node_generic(struct drm_mm *mm, struct drm_mm_node *node,
> +			       unsigned long size, unsigned alignment,
> +			       unsigned long color, int atomic)
>  {
>  	struct drm_mm_node *hole_node;
>  
> -	hole_node = drm_mm_search_free(mm, size, alignment, false);
> +	hole_node = drm_mm_search_free_generic(mm, size, alignment,
> +					       color, atomic);

The last parameter of search_free_generic is best_match, which isn't used
by any current caller. The only reason it's still there is that I haven't
converted yet all drm_mm.c users to preallocate drm_mm_node's, but as soon
as that's done best_match will die together with search_free_generic as a
public interface.

So what's the atomic doing in here? I've looked through the drm/i915
patches and couldn't see any reason ... Can we just respin the two i915
patches with _generic and atomic = false dropped, or do I miss something
big here?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch