[PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:03:29AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.
> 

Sorry, I should have said that it's not a gcc warning, it's a
smatch thing.  But also it's not uber-anal.  It's the exact level of
anality which is required to make the == -1 test work.  You can
compare unsigned int and longs to -1 and it works but for smaller
types it doesn't.

regards,
dan carpenter

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120216/007fc5b2/attachment.pgp>