[PATCH RFC 1/2] drm: add bitmask property type

[Paulo Zanoni]

2012/3/30 Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com>:
> Can't we try to add some document
> (or header file) defining the standard properties and add a way to
> distinguish between? Documentation/drm/properties.txt?
>

After looking at the list names, maybe we should define that standard
properties should be named with "BIG LETTERS ONLY" and non-standard
should be not-only-BIG-LETTERS? This will be backwards-compatible if
we define EDID and DPMS as standard properties (and they don't need to
be mandatory).


-- 
Paulo Zanoni