[PATCH 26/27] drm/radeon: remove r300_gpu_is_lockup
j.glisse at gmail.com
j.glisse at gmail.com
Tue May 1 10:19:36 PDT 2012
From: Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
Since it is now identical to r100_gpu_is_lockup.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c | 14 --------------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c | 16 ++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
index 04ec269..6419a59 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
@@ -377,20 +377,6 @@ void r300_gpu_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
rdev->num_gb_pipes, rdev->num_z_pipes);
}
-bool r300_gpu_is_lockup(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_ring *ring)
-{
- u32 rbbm_status;
-
- rbbm_status = RREG32(R_000E40_RBBM_STATUS);
- if (!G_000E40_GUI_ACTIVE(rbbm_status)) {
- radeon_ring_lockup_update(ring);
- return false;
- }
- /* force CP activities */
- radeon_ring_force_activity(rdev, ring);
- return radeon_ring_test_lockup(rdev, ring);
-}
-
int r300_asic_reset(struct radeon_device *rdev)
{
struct r100_mc_save save;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
index 958b9ea..5e5694e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic r300_asic = {
.ring_start = &r300_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic r300_asic_pcie = {
.ring_start = &r300_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic r420_asic = {
.ring_start = &r300_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic rs400_asic = {
.ring_start = &r300_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic rs600_asic = {
.ring_start = &r300_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic rs690_asic = {
.ring_start = &r300_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic rv515_asic = {
.ring_start = &rv515_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static struct radeon_asic r520_asic = {
.ring_start = &rv515_ring_start,
.ring_test = &r100_ring_test,
.ib_test = &r100_ib_test,
- .is_lockup = &r300_gpu_is_lockup,
+ .is_lockup = &r100_gpu_is_lockup,
}
},
.irq = {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
index d3ec546..3f7ecbb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
@@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ extern int r300_init(struct radeon_device *rdev);
extern void r300_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
extern int r300_suspend(struct radeon_device *rdev);
extern int r300_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev);
-extern bool r300_gpu_is_lockup(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_ring *cp);
extern int r300_asic_reset(struct radeon_device *rdev);
extern void r300_ring_start(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_ring *ring);
extern void r300_fence_ring_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev,
--
1.7.7.6
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list