[PATCH 01/19] drm/radeon: fix possible lack of synchronization btw ttm and other ring

[Christian König]

From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>

We need to sync with the GFX ring as ttm might have schedule bo move
on it and new command scheduled for other ring need to wait for bo
data to be in place.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
Reviewed by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c |   12 ++++++------
 include/drm/radeon_drm.h           |    1 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
index c66beb1..289b0d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
@@ -122,15 +122,15 @@ static int radeon_cs_sync_rings(struct radeon_cs_parser *p)
 	int i, r;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < p->nrelocs; i++) {
+		struct radeon_fence *fence;
+
 		if (!p->relocs[i].robj || !p->relocs[i].robj->tbo.sync_obj)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!(p->relocs[i].flags & RADEON_RELOC_DONT_SYNC)) {
-			struct radeon_fence *fence = p->relocs[i].robj->tbo.sync_obj;
-			if (fence->ring != p->ring && !radeon_fence_signaled(fence)) {
-				sync_to_ring[fence->ring] = true;
-				need_sync = true;
-			}
+		fence = p->relocs[i].robj->tbo.sync_obj;
+		if (fence->ring != p->ring && !radeon_fence_signaled(fence)) {
+			sync_to_ring[fence->ring] = true;
+			need_sync = true;
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/drm/radeon_drm.h b/include/drm/radeon_drm.h
index 7c491b4..5805686 100644
--- a/include/drm/radeon_drm.h
+++ b/include/drm/radeon_drm.h
@@ -926,7 +926,6 @@ struct drm_radeon_cs_chunk {
 };
 
 /* drm_radeon_cs_reloc.flags */
-#define RADEON_RELOC_DONT_SYNC		0x01
 
 struct drm_radeon_cs_reloc {
 	uint32_t		handle;
-- 
1.7.9.5