Fw: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: add a timed wait function
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Wed May 30 15:35:35 PDT 2012
On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:07:57 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> wrote:
> > I guess GL_ALREADY_SIGNALED handling will be done using a check for
> > bo_busy() before calling this.
>
> I've just read through the mesa code and gl_already_signalled seems to
> be handled already by core mesa code in _mesa_ClientWaitSync (if the
> driver sets syncObject->Status correctly). So I guess the current
> kernel code should work as-is and only the libdrm interface needs some
> colour adjustments around the timeout parameter.
Yeah, matches what I found.
Did you want pointer for timeout in the userspace api? I don't feel
strongly about it, I just didn't see a use. The equivalent API I could
think of was select(), where apparently linux returns time unwaited,
while "everyone else" doesn't. I don't see a strong recommendation
either way from that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120530/19bba28a/attachment.pgp>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list