drm-next update
Dave Airlie
airlied at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 03:11:02 PST 2012
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Daniel: I've pulled -next from you, I'm hoping that is all you have
>> for this merge window!
>
> Yeah, winding down, no big stuff pending, just a few small
> bits&pieces. If we'll see an -rc7 release, I'll run another manual QA
> cycle, otherwise I'll just send you a -fixes pull with it somewhen
> next week.
>
>> I've also merge the polling rework, I'll have to spend a bit of time
>> testing it I suppose now.
>
> I've noticed that you didn't merge "drm: don't unnecessarily enable
> the polling work" (note there's a v2 follow-up). Anything wrong with
> it or just overlooked?
>
I thought I did, a4f968d8e50cb7810e08ebb9bf4c8f2b769fdac7
I applied the wrong one and rebased it out, then got the right one later.
> Also, there's my small series to integrate some of the helper in-line
> kerneldoc into Laurent DRM DocBook, starting with "drm/doc: Helpers
> are not a Midlayer!". So of the patches depended upon the dp helper
> refactor, but now that's merged they should apply.
Okay I'll pick them up.
>
> Another thing is the clock_monotonic timestamp stuff for
> pageflips/vblanks. I'll poke Imre about this again, but I guess we'll
> postpone that for 3.9. Otherwise I don't see anything missing.
I merged this, at least the core stuff. It just seemed like it might
go somewhere if it was in the tree :-)
Dave.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list