[PATCHv9 19/25] v4l: vb2: add buffer exporting via dmabuf
t.stanislaws at samsung.com
Wed Oct 10 07:05:22 PDT 2012
On 10/06/2012 02:22 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tue October 2 2012 16:27:30 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> This patch adds extension to videobuf2-core. It allow to export a mmap buffer
>> as a file descriptor.
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws at samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
>> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>> drivers/media/video/videobuf2-core.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 4 ++
>> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-core.c
>> index 05da3b4..a97815b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-core.c
>> @@ -2455,6 +2528,15 @@ int vb2_ioctl_streamoff(struct file *file, void *priv, enum v4l2_buf_type i)
>> +int vb2_ioctl_expbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_exportbuffer *p)
>> + struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(file);
>> + /* No need to call vb2_queue_is_busy(), anyone can export buffers. */
> After thinking about this some more I'm not so sure we should allow this.
> Exporting a buffer also means that the memory can't be freed as long as the
> exported filehandle remains open.
You are completely right.
But the problem is much more complex ... see below.
> That means that it is possible to make a malicious application that exports
> the buffers and never frees them, which can cause havoc.
What kind of havoc do you mean? Resource leakage?
> I think that only
> the filehandle that called REQBUFS/CREATE_BUFS should be allowed to export
Notice that you should allow to call mmap() only for the file handles that called
REQBUFS/CREATE_BUFS. The mmap() creates a vma that holds a reference to a buffer.
As long as the mapping exists, the buffers cannot be freed and REQBUFS(count=0) returns -EBUSY.
According to V4L2 spec all the nodes share the same context, therefore
one process can call REQBUFS, and the other can call QUERYBUF and mmap().
Therefore if EXPBUF has to check vb2_queue_is_busy() then vb2_fop_mmap()
should do the same check too.
IMO, it is very difficult to develop a useful multi-client API that
would protect V4L2 from creating non-freeable buffers by a rogue applications.
I think that the requirements below:
- the buffers should be sharable between processes by mmap(), or DMABUF exporting
- the REQBUFS(count=0) should release the buffers
are contradictory and cannot be *reliably* satisfied at the same time.
Notice that REQBUFS(count=0) that unexpectedly return -EBUSY is not
a reliable solution. The application cannot do anything fix the problem
after receiving -EBUSY.
Anyway, I will apply the check for vb2_queue_is_busy() in v2b_ioctl_expbuf().
> What do you think?
>> + return vb2_expbuf(vdev->queue, p);
>> /* v4l2_file_operations helpers */
>> int vb2_fop_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
More information about the dri-devel