[PATCH] drm/radeon: make 64bit fences more robust v3 (3.5 stable)
alexdeucher at gmail.com
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Thu Sep 20 07:57:01 PDT 2012
From: Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
Only increase the higher 32bits if we really detect a wrap around.
v2: instead of increasing the higher 32bits just use the higher
32bits from the last emitted fence.
v3: also use last emitted fence value as upper limit.
The intention of this patch is to make fences as robust as
they where before introducing 64bit fences. This is
necessary because on older systems it looks like the fence
value gets corrupted on initialization.
Fixes:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
Should also fix:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54129
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54662
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846505
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845639
This is the 3.5 stable version of the patch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=f492c171a38d77fc13a8998a0721f2da50835224
3.4 and previous kernels do not need to be patched.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
index 11f5f40..71298ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ int radeon_fence_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_fence *fence)
void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
{
- uint64_t seq, last_seq;
+ uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted;
unsigned count_loop = 0;
bool wake = false;
@@ -102,13 +102,15 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
*/
last_seq = atomic64_read(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq);
do {
+ last_emitted = rdev->fence_drv[ring].seq;
seq = radeon_fence_read(rdev, ring);
seq |= last_seq & 0xffffffff00000000LL;
if (seq < last_seq) {
- seq += 0x100000000LL;
+ seq &= 0xffffffff;
+ seq |= last_emitted & 0xffffffff00000000LL;
}
- if (seq == last_seq) {
+ if (seq <= last_seq || seq > last_emitted) {
break;
}
/* If we loop over we don't want to return without
--
1.7.7.5
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list