[PATCH 01/10] drm/radeon: UVD doesn't needs VM on SI
Jerome Glisse
j.glisse at gmail.com
Wed Apr 3 07:42:31 PDT 2013
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:18:30AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
> index 70d3824..7d66e01 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
> @@ -241,15 +241,15 @@ int radeon_cs_parser_init(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, void *data)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (radeon_cs_get_ring(p, ring, priority))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* we only support VM on SI+ */
> - if ((p->rdev->family >= CHIP_TAHITI) &&
> - ((p->cs_flags & RADEON_CS_USE_VM) == 0)) {
> + if ((p->rdev->asic->ring[p->ring].cs_parse == NULL) &&
> + ((p->cs_flags & RADEON_CS_USE_VM) == 0)) {
> DRM_ERROR("VM required on SI+!\n");
> return -EINVAL;
What about updating the error message to something more appropriate like
ring %d require virtual memory
Cheers,
Jerome
> }
> -
> - if (radeon_cs_get_ring(p, ring, priority))
> - return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> /* deal with non-vm */
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list