[PATCH v4] drm/exynos: prepare FIMD clocks

[Inki Dae]

2013/4/21 Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> On Monday 08 of April 2013 16:41:54 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 8 April 2013 16:37, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > While migrating to common clock framework (CCF), I found that the FIMD
> > > clocks were pulled down by the CCF.
> > > If CCF finds any clock(s) which has NOT been claimed by any of the
> > > drivers, then such clock(s) are PULLed low by CCF.
> > >
> > > Calling clk_prepare() for FIMD clocks fixes the issue.
> > >
> > > This patch also replaces clk_disable() with clk_unprepare() during
> > > exit, since clk_prepare() is called in fimd_probe().
> >
> > I asked you about fixing your commit log too.. It still looks incorrect
> > to me.
> >
> > This patch doesn't have anything to do with CCF pulling clocks down, but
> > calling clk_prepare() before clk_enable() is must now.. that's it..
> > nothing more.
> >
>
> I fully agree.
>
> The message should be something like:
>
> Common Clock Framework introduced the need to prepare clocks before
> enabling them, otherwise clk_enable() fails. This patch adds clk_prepare
> calls to the driver.
>
> and that's all.
>
> What you are observing as "CCF pulling clocks down" is the fact that
> clk_enable() fails if the clock is not prepared and so the clock is not
> enabled in result.
>
> Another thing is that CCF is not pulling anything down. GPIO pins can be
> pulled down (or up or not pulled), but clocks can be masked, gated or
> simply disabled - this does not imply their signal level.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes since v3:
> > >         - added clk_prepare() in fimd_probe() and clk_unprepare() in
> > >         fimd_remove()>
> > >          as suggested by Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Changes since v2:
> > >         - moved clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() from
> > >         fimd_probe() to fimd_clock() as suggested by Inki Dae
> > >         <inki.dae at samsung.com>>
> > > Changes since v1:
> > >         - added error checking for clk_prepare_enable() and also
> > >         replaced
> > >         clk_disable() with clk_disable_unprepare() during exit.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c index 9537761..aa22370
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
> > > @@ -934,6 +934,16 @@ static int fimd_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)>
> > >                 return ret;
> > >
> > >         }
> > >
> > > +       ret = clk_prepare(ctx->bus_clk);
> > > +       if (ret < 0)
> > > +               return ret;
> > > +
> > > +       ret = clk_prepare(ctx->lcd_clk);
> > > +       if  (ret < 0) {
> > > +               clk_unprepare(ctx->bus_clk);
> > > +               return ret;
> > > +       }
> > > +
>
> Why not just simply use clk_prepare_enable() instead of all calls to
> clk_enable() in the driver?
>
> Same goes for s/clk_disable/clk_disable_unprepare/ .
>
>
I agree with you. Using clk_prepare_enable() is more clear. Actually I had
already commented on this. Please see the patch v2. But this way also looks
good to me.



> > >
> > >         ctx->vidcon0 = pdata->vidcon0;
> > >         ctx->vidcon1 = pdata->vidcon1;
> > >         ctx->default_win = pdata->default_win;
> > >
> > > @@ -981,8 +991,8 @@ static int fimd_remove(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)>
> > >         if (ctx->suspended)
> > >
> > >                 goto out;
> > >
> > > -       clk_disable(ctx->lcd_clk);
> > > -       clk_disable(ctx->bus_clk);
> > > +       clk_unprepare(ctx->lcd_clk);
> > > +       clk_unprepare(ctx->bus_clk);
> >
> > This looks wrong again.. You still need to call clk_disable() to make
> > clk enabled
> > count zero...
>
> Viresh is right again here.
>
>
Ok, you two guys say together this looks wrong so I'd like to take more
checking. I thought that clk->clk_enable is 1 at here and it would be 0 by
pm_runtimg_put_sync(). Is there any my missing point?


> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130421/e7c1f06e/attachment.html>