[pull] tilcdc-next for 3.9

[Rob Clark]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomba at iki.fi> wrote:
>> But my main concern for this series is still that it creates custom
>> panel stuff, and adds DT bindings for them. Which means we need to
>> support those custom DT bindings in the future, even though it's quite
>> sure that CDF should be used also for this driver, changing the bindings.
>
> I'm confused a bit, but shouldn't the DT bindings and CDF be rather
> orthogonal? Of course for ARM board support we need to have DT binding
> tables in the kernel to match up hw with the drivers, but I've thought
> it should be pretty much irrelevant which driver is hooking up to a
> given dt binding ...

I expect main thing that could/would change is who is the parent
device.. well that and the 'compatible' string probably changes?

BR,
-R

> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch