[PATCH] drm/i915: clarify reasoning for the access_ok call
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Mar 11 14:13:26 PDT 2013
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:04:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Probably not. It just seemed like the existing comment was
> insufficient after the removal of the redundant VERIFY_READ check that
> happened recently.
That's certainly true, the remaining comment is a little cryptic.
Something more like:
/* We need to check that we can read the entire relocation array, but
* as we may need to update the presumed_offsets upon execution, we
* need to check now for full write access.
*/
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list