[PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Allow specifying a minimum brightness level for sysfs control.
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Mar 26 08:20:29 PDT 2013
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:13:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:48:45PM +0100, Danny Baumann wrote:
> > When controlling backlight devices via sysfs interface, user space
> > generally assumes the minimum level (0) still providing a brightness
> > that is usable by the user (probably due to the most commonly used
> > backlight device, acpi_videoX, behaving exactly like that). This doesn't
> > match the current behaviour of the intel_backlight control, though, as
> > the value 0 means 'backlight off'.
> >
> > In order to make intel_backlight consistent to other backlight devices,
> > introduce a module parameter that allows shifting the 0 level of the
> > intel_backlight device. It's expressed in percentages of the maximum
> > level. The default is 5, which provides a backlight level that is barely
> > readable. Setting it to 0 restores the old behaviour.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann at web.de>
>
> Thus far our assumption always was that the acpi backlight works better
> than the intel native backlight. So everything only uses the intel
> backlight if there's no other backlight driver by default.
There are machines, such as the pnv netbook on my desk, on which
intel_backlight does nothing and the only control is through
acpi_backlight0. Generalising expected behaviour based on one firmware
implementation is fraught with danger.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list