[PATCH] compat/compat-drivers/linux-next: fb skip_vt_switch

[Julia Lawall]

> > I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one
> > initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field.  So
> > perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed.
> 
> Oh sorry now I get what you mean! I thought about this -- and yes I
> decided to not add a bool false setting for the structure field given
> that the assumption is this would not be something dynamic, and data
> structure would be kzalloc()'d so by default they are 0.

What do you do about the test, though?

julia