[PATCH v2 12/26] drm/exynos: Split manager/display/subdrv

[Thierry Reding]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:29:55PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> > I believe this is a huge step backwards from current kernel design
> > standards, which prefer modularity.
> 
> But it makes things behave in the way that userspace expects, which is
> more important.

Why would userspace care about the modularity of kernel drivers? The
only thing that userspace should care about is whether there's a DRM
device or not. How the kernel makes that happen should be completely
irrelevant to userspace.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131104/415173b1/attachment.pgp>