[PATCH 07/19] drm/host1x: Call drm_put_dev directly instead of drm_platform_exit

[Thierry Reding]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:14:39AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> I'm a bit confused about how this all works wrt host1x clients, but
> >> this patch looks like the right thing to me.
> >>
> >> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c | 3 +--
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > This has been largely rewritten in the code that I submitted in my 3.13
> > pull request. In fact Tegra DRM no longer uses drm_platform, but a
> > custom bus type to deal with the quirkiness of the multi-driver
> > architecture.
> >
> > So if you really want to get rid of drm_bus altogether I'd appreciate a
> > heads-up so I know what's coming and can prepare.
> 
> It's almost completely gone now, the one thing left to do is rip out
> bus->set_busid. But I have that planned already.
> 
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/log/?h=drm-init-cleanup
> 
> I guess I get to rebase the entire thing again, meh.
> 
> <rant>
> It'd be awesome of other drm drivers would submit their stuff a bit
> earlier, atm there's absolutely nothing in drm-next beside all of
> intel and a few things for armada... Maybe we need to have a drm
> integration tree to make this a bit less frustrating.
> </rant>

Yeah, I know. I had actually planned on sending out this pull request
much earlier, but then all the discussion around DRM panel and device
tree bindings started again...

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131104/929a9be8/attachment.pgp>