[PATCHv3 2/4] drm/tegra: Add runtime pm support for gr2d

[Arto Merilainen]

On 10/01/2013 09:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 06:05 AM, Arto Merilainen wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/gr2d.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/gr2d.c
>
>> @@ -327,11 +336,48 @@ static int __exit gr2d_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		host1x_syncpt_free(gr2d->client.syncpts[i]);
>>
>>   	host1x_channel_free(gr2d->channel);
>> +
>> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev))
>> +		pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> +	else
>> +		gr2d_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>
> This code is slightly different to the code in e.g.
> sound/soc/tegra/tegra20_i2s.c:remove(), whereas the code in probe() is
> identical. I'm not sure whether there's some advantage in this version?
> If so, perhaps the sound drivers should be updated to be consistent. If
> not, perhaps this driver should do the same thing as the I2S driver, so
> we keep the drivers consistent, and provide the same "example" code
> everywhere.

Hmm. I cannot immediately see any advantage in this version... I will 
update the patch.

>
>> +static int gr2d_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct gr2d *gr2d;
>> +
>> +	gr2d = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	if (!gr2d)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>
> Presumably, gr2d will never be NULL here, unless there's some chronic
> bug. Can't we re-write those last 5 lines as simply:
>
> 	struct gr2d *grd2 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> If that's not valid, we should probably update the audio drivers (and
> perhaps others) too.

I think you are correct. I cannot see any reason why that check is required.

- Arto