[PATCH v3 12/32] drm/exynos: Split manager/display/subdrv
Sean Paul
seanpaul at chromium.org
Thu Oct 31 17:08:41 CET 2013
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sean Paul [mailto:seanpaul at chromium.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:13 AM
>> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; inki.dae at samsung.com
>> Cc: airlied at linux.ie; tomasz.figa at gmail.com; marcheu at chromium.org; Sean
>> Paul
>> Subject: [PATCH v3 12/32] drm/exynos: Split manager/display/subdrv
>>
>> This patch splits display and manager from subdrv. The result is that
>> crtc functions can directly call into manager callbacks and encoder
>> functions can directly call into display callbacks. This will allow
>> us to remove the exynos_drm_hdmi shim and support mixer/hdmi & fimd/dp
>> with common code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Pass display into display_ops instead of context
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Changed vidi args to exynos_drm_display instead of void
>> - Moved exynos_drm_hdmi.c removal into next patch
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_connector.c | 50 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_core.c | 181 +++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c | 115 +++++++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.h | 20 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 29 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h | 106 +++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_encoder.c | 258
> ++++------------------
>> ----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_encoder.h | 18 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c | 161 ++++++++--------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_hdmi.c | 211 +++++++++------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_hdmi.h | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c | 15 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c | 129 ++++++-------
>> 14 files changed, 615 insertions(+), 684 deletions(-)
>>
>> static int exynos_drm_create_enc_conn(struct drm_device *dev,
>> - struct exynos_drm_subdrv *subdrv)
>> + struct exynos_drm_display *display)
>> {
>> struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>> struct drm_connector *connector;
>> + struct exynos_drm_manager *manager;
>> int ret;
>> + unsigned long possible_crtcs = 0;
>>
>> - subdrv->manager->dev = subdrv->dev;
>> + /* Find possible crtcs for this display */
>> + list_for_each_entry(manager, &exynos_drm_manager_list, list)
>> + if (manager->type == display->type)
>> + possible_crtcs |= 1 << manager->pipe;
>>
>> /* create and initialize a encoder for this sub driver. */
>> - encoder = exynos_drm_encoder_create(dev, subdrv->manager,
>> - (1 << MAX_CRTC) - 1);
>> + encoder = exynos_drm_encoder_create(dev, display, possible_crtcs);
>> if (!encoder) {
>> DRM_ERROR("failed to create encoder\n");
>> return -EFAULT;
>> }
>> - subdrv->encoder = encoder;
>> + display->encoder = encoder;
>>
>> - if (subdrv->manager->display_ops->type == EXYNOS_DISPLAY_TYPE_LCD)
>> {
>> + if (display->type == EXYNOS_DISPLAY_TYPE_LCD) {
>> ret = exynos_drm_attach_lcd_bridge(dev, encoder);
>
> The lvds bridge related codes need more reviews
I think everyone agrees that there need not be a 1:1 binding to driver
relationship, so what is left to discuss?
Sean
> so I'll merge this patch
> manually excepting the lvds bridge related codes. Let's discuss lvds bridge
> later.
>
> Thanks,
> Inki Dae
>
>> if (ret)
>> return 0;
>> @@ -91,7 +98,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_create_enc_conn(struct drm_device
>> *dev,
>> goto err_destroy_encoder;
>> }
>>
>> - subdrv->connector = connector;
>> + display->connector = connector;
>>
>> return 0;
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list