[PATCH/RFC v3 00/19] Common Display Framework

Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkeinen at ti.com
Mon Sep 9 05:12:40 PDT 2013

On 21/08/13 15:22, Rob Clark wrote:

> And just to be clear, part of my negative experience about this is the
> omapdss/omapdrm split.  I just see cfd outside of drm as encouraging
> others to make the same mistake.

Feel free to disagree, but I think the omapdss/omapdrm split is a bit
different matter. The main problem there was splitting the control of a
single device (OMAP DSS, and more specifically, DISPC) into two.

I don't see CDF causing anything similar. A single DRM driver should
manage the DISPC in OMAP's case, and it should (probably) also control
the external encoders and panel, even if those are independent CDF drivers.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130909/954282ce/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the dri-devel mailing list