[PATCH 2/4] drm/dp/i2c: send bare addresses to properly reset i2c connections (v2)
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Apr 4 11:46:30 PDT 2014
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:52:04PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> We need bare address packets at the start and end of
> each i2c over aux transaction to properly reset the connection
> between transactions. This mirrors what the existing dp i2c
> over aux algo currently does.
>
> This fixes EDID fetches on certain monitors especially with
> dp bridges.
>
> v2: update as per Ville's comments
> - Set buffer to NULL for zero sized packets
> - abort the entre transaction if one of the messages fails
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 74724aa..125f84d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -664,12 +664,25 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> int num)
> {
> struct drm_dp_aux *aux = adapter->algo_data;
> - unsigned int i, j;
> + unsigned int m, b;
> + struct drm_dp_aux_msg msg;
> + int err = 0;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> - struct drm_dp_aux_msg msg;
> - int err;
> + memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
>
> + for (m = 0; m < num; m++) {
> + msg.address = msgs[m].addr;
> + msg.request = (msgs[m].flags & I2C_M_RD) ?
> + DP_AUX_I2C_READ :
> + DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE;
> + msg.request |= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> + msg.buffer = NULL;
> + msg.size = 0;
> + err = drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(aux, &msg);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + printk("error %d in bare address write\n", err);
I guess this printk was some leftover debug thing? Either should be
dropped or converted to some more appropriate DRM_ thing I suppose.
But otherwise the patch looks good:
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> + break;
> + }
> /*
> * Many hardware implementations support FIFOs larger than a
> * single byte, but it has been empirically determined that
> @@ -677,31 +690,26 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> * decreased performance. Therefore each message is simply
> * transferred byte-by-byte.
> */
> - for (j = 0; j < msgs[i].len; j++) {
> - memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> - msg.address = msgs[i].addr;
> -
> - msg.request = (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) ?
> - DP_AUX_I2C_READ :
> - DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE;
> -
> - /*
> - * All messages except the last one are middle-of-
> - * transfer messages.
> - */
> - if ((i < num - 1) || (j < msgs[i].len - 1))
> - msg.request |= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> -
> - msg.buffer = msgs[i].buf + j;
> + for (b = 0; b < msgs[m].len; b++) {
> + msg.buffer = msgs[m].buf + b;
> msg.size = 1;
>
> err = drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(aux, &msg);
> if (err < 0)
> - return err;
> + break;
> }
> + if (err < 0)
> + break;
> }
> -
> - return num;
> + if (err >= 0)
> + err = num;
> + /* send a bare address packet to close out the connection */
> + msg.request &= ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> + msg.buffer = NULL;
> + msg.size = 0;
> + (void)drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(aux, &msg);
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> static const struct i2c_algorithm drm_dp_i2c_algo = {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list