[PATCH v2 libdrm 1/7] configure: Support symbol visibility when available

[Erik Faye-Lund]

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/libdrm.h b/libdrm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..23926e6f6741
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libdrm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2014 NVIDIA Corporation
> + *
> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
> + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
> + * THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S) OR AUTHOR(S) BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
> + * OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
> + * ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef LIBDRM_LIBDRM_H
> +#define LIBDRM_LIBDRM_H

LIBDRM_LIBDRM_H sounds a bit clunky to me. Why LIBDRM twice? The other
headers don't seem to prefix LIBDRM_ to their header-guards. In fact,
many of them don't even have header-guards.

Also, does these macro really warrant making a top-level, generically
named header?