[PATCH] drm/radeon: Inline r100_mm_rreg

[Christian König]

Am 10.04.2014 20:52, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Lauri Kasanen <cand at gmx.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:19:10 -0400
>> Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>> +static inline uint32_t r100_mm_rreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, uint32_t reg,
>>>> +                                   bool always_indirect)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       if (reg < rdev->rmmio_size && !always_indirect)
>>>> +               return readl(((void __iomem *)rdev->rmmio) + reg);
>>> Quick thought from someone entirely unfamiliar with the hardware:
>>> perhaps you can get the performance benefit without the size increase
>>> by moving the else portion into a non-inline function? I'm guessing
>>> that most accesses happen in the "if" branch.
>> The function call overhead is about equal to branching overhead, so
>> splitting it would only help about half that. It's called from many
>> places, and a lot of calls per sec.

Actually direct register access shouldn't be necessary so often. Apart 
from page flips, write/read pointer updates and irq processing there 
shouldn't be so many of them. Could you clarify a bit more what issue 
you are seeing here?

> Is that really true? I haven't profiled it, but a function call has to
> save/restore registers, set up new stack, etc. And the jump is to some
> far-away code, so perhaps less likely to be in i-cache? (But maybe
> not, not sure on the details of how all that works.) And I'm guessing
> most of the size increase is coming from the spinlock/unlock, which,
> I'm guessing again, is the much-rarer case.
>
> And the branch would happen either way... so that's a sunk cost.
> (Except I bet that the always_indirect param is always constant and
> that bit of the if can be resolved at compile time with that part
> being inlined.)
>
> Anyways, it was just a thought.

And a pretty much correct one. The "else" case shouldn't be necessary on 
modern hardware any more and so nearly never taken.

Christian.

>
>    -ilia
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel