[PATCH 02/18] drm/irq: simplify irq checks in drm_wait_vblank
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Fri Apr 11 14:35:59 PDT 2014
Checking for both an irq number _and_ whether it's enabled is
redundant. Originally I've thought the drm_dev_to_irq call would break
drivers which do their own irq checking, but those shouldn't have
DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ set as Thierry Reding pointed out. But such drivers
already need to set dev->irq_enabled for other reasons, so we might as
well ditch that check, too.
v2: Also drop the HAVE_IRQ check.
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index bd6e65fde1b9..7ef98c01c3d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -1160,9 +1160,8 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
int ret;
unsigned int flags, seq, crtc, high_crtc;
- if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ))
- if ((!drm_dev_to_irq(dev)) || (!dev->irq_enabled))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!dev->irq_enabled)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (vblwait->request.type & _DRM_VBLANK_SIGNAL)
return -EINVAL;
--
1.8.5.2
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list