[PATCH] drm: Provide drm_set_busid() fallback

[David Herrmann]

Hi

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Hm, my plan was actually to just provide a drm_dev_setunique to drivers so
> that they can set whatever their userspace wants, and then have no
> set_busid implementation here at all for !pci. Some userspace at least
> uses the unique thing to match for the driver, so we need to do the usual
> bending over backwards to keep it consistent.

What's the different between a hard-coded per-driver string and
dev_name()? I mean, doesn't the device name include the driver string?
Or do drivers require more fine-grained naming? Like chipset-specific
suffixes/prefixes in the busid?

Anyway, I'm fine with both and really like the approach of killing of
drm_bus. So all acked-by me.

Thanks
David