[PATCH RFC 26/46] drivers/base: provide an infrastructure for componentised subsystems
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Fri Jan 10 06:54:44 PST 2014
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:10:55PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 09:27:58PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > Subsystems such as ALSA, DRM and others require a single card-level
> > device structure to represent a subsystem. However, firmware tends to
> > describe the individual devices and the connections between them.
> >
> > Therefore, we need a way to gather up the individual component devices
> > together, and indicate when we have all the component devices.
> >
> > We do this in DT by providing a "superdevice" node which specifies
> > the components, eg:
> >
> > imx-drm {
> > compatible = "fsl,drm";
> > crtcs = <&ipu1>;
> > connectors = <&hdmi>;
> > };
> >
> > The superdevice is declared into the component support, along with the
> > subcomponents. The superdevice receives callbacks to locate the
> > subcomponents, and identify when all components are present. At this
> > point, we bind the superdevice, which causes the appropriate subsystem
> > to be initialised in the conventional way.
> >
> > When any of the components or superdevice are removed from the system,
> > we unbind the superdevice, thereby taking the subsystem down.
>
> This sounds a lot like the "containers" code that Rafael just submitted
> and I acked for 3.14. Look at the lkml post:
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way
> Message-ID: <1991202.gilW172FBV at vostro.rjw.lan>
>
> And see if that could possibly be used instead?
Greg,
Not sure if you saw the outcome to your comment above. My conclusion
was:
"Yes, I'm coming to that conclusion as well. It looks like your "containers"
aren't about collecting up several individual component devices into one
super-device and probing the appropriate subsystem when all components are
known.
"Confused why Greg is pointing me at your patches."
Does this mean you're happy with the patch?
Thanks.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list