[PATCH 6/7] drm/crtc: add sanity checks to create_dumb()
David Herrmann
dh.herrmann at gmail.com
Tue Jan 21 03:17:35 PST 2014
Hi
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:26:28PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Lets make sure some basic expressions are always true:
>> bpp != NULL
>> width != NULL
>> height != NULL
>> stride = bpp * width < 2^32
>> size = stride * height < 2^32
>> PAGE_ALIGN(size) < 2^32
>>
>> At least the udl driver doesn't check for multiplication-overflows, so
>> lets just make sure it will never happen. These checks allow drivers to do
>> any 32bit math without having to test for mult-overflows themselves.
>>
>> The two divisions might hurt performance a bit, but dumb_create() is only
>> used for scanout-buffers, so that should be fine. We could use 64bit math
>> to avoid the divisions, but that may be slow on 32bit machines.. Or maybe
>> there should just be a "safe_mult32()" helper, which currently doesn't
>> exist (I think?).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>> index 266a01d..ff647fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>> @@ -3738,9 +3738,24 @@ int drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>> void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>> {
>> struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args = data;
>> + u32 Bpp, stride, size;
>
> s/Bpp/bpp/
It's actually "Bytes per pixel", not "Bits per pixel". We generally
use "bpp" as "bits per pixel" so I'd like to avoid the confusion. But
yeah, upper-case names are unusual so I can also use bytes_pp or sth
similar?
>>
>> if (!dev->driver->dumb_create)
>> return -ENOSYS;
>> + if (!args->width || !args->height || !args->bpp)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* overflow checks for 32bit size calculations */
>> + Bpp = (args->bpp + 7) / 8;
>
> Again DIV_ROUND_UP
yepp, fixed.
>
>> + if (Bpp > 0xffffffffU / args->width)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + stride = Bpp * args->width;
>> + if (args->height > 0xffffffffU / stride)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + size = args->height * stride;
>> + if (PAGE_ALIGN(size) < size)
>
> Maybe check for 0 here and add a small comment that this checks
> wrap-around.
Hm, the comment above those if()s already says "overflow checks", and
it should be obvious that all three are overflow checks, so I don't
think we need another comment (especially because I didn't add any
empty lines between them).
I will change it to "if (!PAGE_ALIGN(size))". The "x + off < x" is an
addition-overflow-check so I think it doesn't apply here.
Thanks
David
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> return dev->driver->dumb_create(file_priv, dev, args);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.5.3
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list