[PATCH 02/83] drm/radeon: reduce number of free VMIDs and pipes in KV
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Fri Jul 11 09:18:54 PDT 2014
Am 11.07.2014 18:05, schrieb Jerome Glisse:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50:02AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> To support HSA on KV, we need to limit the number of vmids and pipes
>> that are available for radeon's use with KV.
>>
>> This patch reserves VMIDs 8-15 for KFD (so radeon can only use VMIDs
>> 0-7) and also makes radeon thinks that KV has only a single MEC with a single
>> pipe in it
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
At least fro the VMIDs on demand allocation should be trivial to
implement, so I would rather prefer this instead of a fixed assignment.
Christian.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>> index 4bfc2c0..e0c8052 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>> @@ -4662,12 +4662,11 @@ static int cik_mec_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>> /*
>> * KV: 2 MEC, 4 Pipes/MEC, 8 Queues/Pipe - 64 Queues total
>> * CI/KB: 1 MEC, 4 Pipes/MEC, 8 Queues/Pipe - 32 Queues total
>> + * Nonetheless, we assign only 1 pipe because all other pipes will
>> + * be handled by KFD
>> */
>> - if (rdev->family == CHIP_KAVERI)
>> - rdev->mec.num_mec = 2;
>> - else
>> - rdev->mec.num_mec = 1;
>> - rdev->mec.num_pipe = 4;
>> + rdev->mec.num_mec = 1;
>> + rdev->mec.num_pipe = 1;
>> rdev->mec.num_queue = rdev->mec.num_mec * rdev->mec.num_pipe * 8;
>>
>> if (rdev->mec.hpd_eop_obj == NULL) {
>> @@ -4809,28 +4808,24 @@ static int cik_cp_compute_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>>
>> /* init the pipes */
>> mutex_lock(&rdev->srbm_mutex);
>> - for (i = 0; i < (rdev->mec.num_pipe * rdev->mec.num_mec); i++) {
>> - int me = (i < 4) ? 1 : 2;
>> - int pipe = (i < 4) ? i : (i - 4);
>>
>> - eop_gpu_addr = rdev->mec.hpd_eop_gpu_addr + (i * MEC_HPD_SIZE * 2);
>> + eop_gpu_addr = rdev->mec.hpd_eop_gpu_addr;
>>
>> - cik_srbm_select(rdev, me, pipe, 0, 0);
>> + cik_srbm_select(rdev, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>>
>> - /* write the EOP addr */
>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR, eop_gpu_addr >> 8);
>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(eop_gpu_addr) >> 8);
>> + /* write the EOP addr */
>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR, eop_gpu_addr >> 8);
>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(eop_gpu_addr) >> 8);
>>
>> - /* set the VMID assigned */
>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_VMID, 0);
>> + /* set the VMID assigned */
>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_VMID, 0);
>> +
>> + /* set the EOP size, register value is 2^(EOP_SIZE+1) dwords */
>> + tmp = RREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL);
>> + tmp &= ~EOP_SIZE_MASK;
>> + tmp |= order_base_2(MEC_HPD_SIZE / 8);
>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL, tmp);
>>
>> - /* set the EOP size, register value is 2^(EOP_SIZE+1) dwords */
>> - tmp = RREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL);
>> - tmp &= ~EOP_SIZE_MASK;
>> - tmp |= order_base_2(MEC_HPD_SIZE / 8);
>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL, tmp);
>> - }
>> - cik_srbm_select(rdev, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>> mutex_unlock(&rdev->srbm_mutex);
>>
>> /* init the queues. Just two for now. */
>> @@ -5876,8 +5871,13 @@ int cik_ib_parse(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_ib *ib)
>> */
>> int cik_vm_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>> {
>> - /* number of VMs */
>> - rdev->vm_manager.nvm = 16;
>> + /*
>> + * number of VMs
>> + * VMID 0 is reserved for Graphics
>> + * radeon compute will use VMIDs 1-7
>> + * KFD will use VMIDs 8-15
>> + */
>> + rdev->vm_manager.nvm = 8;
>> /* base offset of vram pages */
>> if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_IGP) {
>> u64 tmp = RREG32(MC_VM_FB_OFFSET);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list