[PATCH] drm/radeon/cs: return an error if no uvd support
Christian König
deathsimple at vodafone.de
Thu Mar 6 00:56:07 PST 2014
Am 05.03.2014 23:03, schrieb Alex Deucher:
> When selecting the engine, return an error if the GPU
> doesn't have UVD.
Why exactly is that needed? If UVD isn't present the ring should be
active, so we should fail the same way just a little bit later.
Additional to that userspace should check before submitting a job if UVD
is available or not.
Christian.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
> index dfb5a1d..fa7839b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,10 @@ static int radeon_cs_get_ring(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 ring, s32 priority
> }
> break;
> case RADEON_CS_RING_UVD:
> - p->ring = R600_RING_TYPE_UVD_INDEX;
> + if (p->rdev->has_uvd)
> + p->ring = R600_RING_TYPE_UVD_INDEX;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> break;
> }
> return 0;
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list