[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver
Kishon Vijay Abraham I
kishon at ti.com
Mon May 5 02:44:18 PDT 2014
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent
>> of SoC, something like "samsung,exynos-simple-phy" and provide Reg
>> and Bit through phy provider node. This way we can avoid SoC specific
>> hardcoding in phy driver and don't need to look into dt bindings for
>> each new SoC.
> I believe it is a not recommended approach.
Why not? We should try to avoid hard coding in the driver code. Moreover by
avoiding hardcoding we can make it a generic driver for single bit PHYs.
More information about the dri-devel