CIK hangs with kernel 3.15, bisected

Grigori Goronzy greg at chown.ath.cx
Tue May 13 13:19:30 PDT 2014 

On 13.05.2014 21:50, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> The performance regression I saw with piglit seems to be fixed with
> latest kernel git. It's difficult to bisect the kernel, because there
> are only merges between 3.14 and 3.15 and the merged committs are
> actually based on 3.14-rc1 and 3.14-rc4.
>
> All seems to be fine with your fixes.
>

Which fixes have you applied? There are quite a few pending patches on 
dri-devel, that aren't yet part of drm-fixes-3.15.

Grigori

> Marek
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Christian König
> <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
>> Is the performance regression regression caused by the page table changes or
>> something else?
>>
>> I did made some tests with xonotic while developing it and it didn't showed
>> anything obvious, but I didn't made tests on different systems.
>>
>> Christian.
>>
>> Am 13.05.2014 17:19, schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>
>>> Your latest patches fix the regression.
>>>
>>> The performance regression can also be reproduced with piglit "-t
>>> texelFetch.fs".
>>>
>>> Kernel 3.14:
>>>      real    0m17.724s
>>>      user    0m41.905s
>>>      sys    0m11.299s
>>>
>>> The problematic commit checked out + your fixes (without the PTE patch I
>>> think):
>>>      real    0m23.474s
>>>      user    1m1.008s
>>>      sys    0m13.812s
>>>
>>> Marek
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Christian König
>>> <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 13.05.2014 15:22, schrieb Alex Deucher:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Grigori Goronzy <greg at chown.ath.cx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can confirm this fixes it for me, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3.15 with these fixes and the large PTE patches actually ends up being
>>>>>> noticeably slower than earlier kernels with Xonotic, though. I wonder
>>>>>> what's
>>>>>> going on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Allocation overhead?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unlikely, Xonotic just allocates a single page table at start, which then
>>>> gets extended to a certain rate until they no longer need more address
>>>> space
>>>> and are done with it.
>>>>
>>>> Grigori, can you bisect and/or try to figure out what's wrong here?
>>>>
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Grigori
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12.05.2014 14:50, Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could reproduce the problem with xonotic and I think I've found the
>>>>>>> issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please test the attached patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 11.05.2014 11:06, schrieb Christian König:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have tested it and it doesn't fix the hangs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, thought so. Well it was just a guess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Also, I don't like the patch, because it reverts the behavior I
>>>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>>>> for userspace buffers.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually it shouldn't affect that. The alternative domain always
>>>>>>>> contains GART even when userspace only specified VRAM as placement
>>>>>>>> (as
>>>>>>>> long as it is technical possible to do so).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what should happen is that TTM sees the current placement, matches
>>>>>>>> that with the desired placement and should find that it doesn't need
>>>>>>>> to move the buffer (we should just test if this behavior really works
>>>>>>>> as expected).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 10.05.2014 23:38, schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have tested it and it doesn't fix the hangs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Also, I don't like the patch, because it reverts the behavior I
>>>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>>>> for userspace buffers.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Marek
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Christian König
>>>>>>>>> <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't reproduce the issue so far. So the attached patch is just
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> complete shoot into the dark found by rereading the code, but it
>>>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>> actually be the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please give it a try.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Going to keep testing in the meantime,
>>>>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 10.05.2014 10:23, schrieb Christian König:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see hangs with kernel 3.15 and SI under memory pressure, e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>> I boot
>>>>>>>>>>>> with radeon.vramlimit=256 and then run Xonotic timedemo with high
>>>>>>>>>>>> settings.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I haven't had a chance to bisect it yet, but it might be a
>>>>>>>>>>>> similar
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like the same issue to me. Thx for the good test case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea what is wrong with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually I already wondered that it went so smooth without any
>>>>>>>>>>> regression
>>>>>>>>>>> so far, didn't noticed the bug in bugzilla.kernel.org yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of the tests allocate a lot of MSAA textures and the tests
>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>> run in parallel, which creates a lot of memory pressure and
>>>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>>>>> causes buffer evictions.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like the underlying problem to me. We probably evict some
>>>>>>>>>>> part of a
>>>>>>>>>>> page table without updating the page directory. Going to dig into
>>>>>>>>>>> it today,
>>>>>>>>>>> it's probably just a one liner missing somewhere in the VM code.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 09.05.2014 23:39, schrieb Grigori Goronzy:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09.05.2014 20:03, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This commit which first appeared in 3.15-rc1 causes hangs on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bonaire:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The simplest way to reproduce the hangs is to run piglit with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -t texelFetch.fs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of the tests allocate a lot of MSAA textures and the tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> run in parallel, which creates a lot of memory pressure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes buffer evictions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see hangs with kernel 3.15 and SI under memory pressure, e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>> I boot
>>>>>>>>>>>> with radeon.vramlimit=256 and then run Xonotic timedemo with high
>>>>>>>>>>>> settings.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I haven't had a chance to bisect it yet, but it might be a
>>>>>>>>>>>> similar
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Grigori
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>

More information about the dri-devel mailing list