[PATCH 1/3] drm/exynos: free DP if probe fails to find a panel or bridge
Jingoo Han
jg1.han at samsung.com
Sun Nov 23 01:22:46 PST 2014
On Saturday, November 22, 2014 2:40 AM, Ajay kumar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo at padovan.org> wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> >
> > DP was leaked everytime function returns EPROBE_DEFER, free it before
> > returning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> > index 85762cf..6fd4a46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> > @@ -1336,8 +1336,10 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (panel_node) {
> > dp->panel = of_drm_find_panel(panel_node);
> > of_node_put(panel_node);
> > - if (!dp->panel)
> > - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + if (!dp->panel) {
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + goto free_dp;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev->of_node, NULL);
> > @@ -1346,10 +1348,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (bridge_node) {
> > dp->bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(bridge_node);
> > of_node_put(bridge_node);
> > - if (!dp->bridge)
> > - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > - } else
> > - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + if (!dp->bridge) {
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + goto free_dp;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + goto free_dp;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > exynos_dp_display.ctx = dp;
> > @@ -1359,6 +1365,9 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > exynos_drm_component_del(&pdev->dev,
> > EXYNOS_DEVICE_TYPE_CONNECTOR);
> >
> > +free_dp:
> > + devm_kfree(dev, dp);
> I guess the driver core takes care of freeing the devm memory when the
> probe fails?
> Will it not happen during PROBE_DEFER?
>
> Inki/Jingoo - Is this change really necessary?
As far as I know, this devm_kfree() in unnecessary,
even though PROBE_DEFER is returned.
If I am wrong, please let me know. Thanks.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
>
> Ajay
>
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.3
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list