[PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: don't try to enable a crtc without fb

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Sun Oct 19 04:47:12 PDT 2014


On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:56:38PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On valleyview, all enabled pipes get added to the prepare mask.  However
> > if you did state readout to find that the crtc is enabled, but failed to
> > map stolen mem and wrap it in a bo (and fb), you could end up in a
> > scenario where crtc->primary->fb is still null on first modeset.  So
> > lets check for this rather than exploding.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > As with http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-September/069341.html
> > the root cause is issues with stolen region.  But it would be nice if
> > i915 was a bit less fragile when things don't go as planned.
> > 
> > This could have the side effect that, at first modeset, the crtc's which
> > were enabled by BIOS but not yet set (by fbcon or userspace) get disabled.
> > This is a somewhat lesser inconvenience compared to opps'ing under
> > console_lock.
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index d8324c6..9f85033 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -10895,6 +10895,9 @@ static int __intel_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >  
> >  	/* Now enable the clocks, plane, pipe, and connectors that we set up. */
> >  	for_each_intel_crtc_masked(dev, prepare_pipes, intel_crtc) {
> > +		if (!intel_crtc->base.primary->fb)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> 
> I think the right fix would be to turn off the primary plane during
> the sanitize phase. Although our primary plane code isn't quite up to
> the task yet since we'd still try to turn it back on during
> .crtc_enable(). The code is somewhat in flux currently and hopefully
> soon we'd be able to handle that case correctly.
> 
> In the meantime we could potentially disable the whole crtc in
> intel_sanitize_crtc() or we could stick a hack into 
> intel_enable_primary_hw_plane() so that it won't try to enable the plane
> w/o an fb (with a comment stating that it's a temporary kludge).

Yeah, I think whacking a temporary hack into sanitize_crtc is the better
option. Long term we really want what Ville said and just disable the
primary plane. But until we've fully untangled that mess in prep for
atomic modesets we can't do that just yet.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the dri-devel mailing list