[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: don't try using training pattern 3 on pre-haswell

[Jesse Barnes]

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:07:32 +0200
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:23:50AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >> From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
> >> >> 
> >> >> Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a drm error on every modeset, since
> >> >> IVB doesn't support DP3 we should even bother trying to use it.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> (on irc)
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 +++-
> >> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >> 
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> >> index f6a3fdd..87cfb92 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> >> @@ -3547,13 +3547,15 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> >>  void
> >> >>  intel_dp_complete_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> >>  {
> >> >> +	struct drm_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base;
> >> >> +	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
> >> >>  	bool channel_eq = false;
> >> >>  	int tries, cr_tries;
> >> >>  	uint32_t DP = intel_dp->DP;
> >> >>  	uint32_t training_pattern = DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_2;
> >> >>  
> >> >>  	/* Training Pattern 3 for HBR2 ot 1.2 devices that support it*/
> >> >> -	if (intel_dp->link_bw == DP_LINK_BW_5_4 || intel_dp->use_tps3)
> >> >> +	if ((intel_dp->link_bw == DP_LINK_BW_5_4 || intel_dp->use_tps3) && !HAS_DDI(dev))
> >> >
> >> > CHV has pattern 3.
> >> 
> >> Is "supports tps3" the same set of platforms as "supports 5.4 Gbps"? We
> >> should abstract the check from intel_dp_max_link_bw.
> >
> > Not quite. HSW-ULX supports pattern 3 even though it doesn't do 5.4 Gbps.
> 
> How about [1] instead? I forgot --in-reply-to, sorry.
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> [1] http://mid.gmane.org/1414573406-17071-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com

Looks like we need something like that at least, assuming we're not
hitting the link_bw == DP_LINK_BW_5_4 case.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center