[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm: Don't update vblank timestamp when the counter didn't change

[Jani Nikula]

On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 06:25:54PM +0200, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>> The current drm-next misses Ville's original Patch 14/19, the one i first
>> objected, then objected to my objection. It is needed to avoid actual
>> regressions. Attached a trivially rebased (v2) of Ville's patch to go on top
>> of drm-next, also as tgz in case my e-mail client mangles the patch again,
>> because it's one of those "email hates me" weeks.
>
> Oh dear, I've made a decent mess of all of this really. Picked up to make
> sure it doesn't get lost again.

After all this nice ping pong our QA has reported a bisected regression
on this commit: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84161

BR,
Jani.



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center