[PATCH] drm/radeon: use 0-255 rather than 0-100 for pwm fan range

Martin Peres martin.peres at free.fr
Sat Apr 11 02:52:36 PDT 2015


On 05/02/2015 11:49, Christian König wrote:
> Am 04.02.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>> 0-255 seems to be the preferred range for the pwm interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> Yeah, using 100 on a 8bit pwm timer sounds rather obviously wrong.
>
> Patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>
>> ---
>>    drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c | 8 ++++++--
>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
>> index 91e1bd2..9f758d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
>> @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static ssize_t radeon_hwmon_set_pwm1_enable(struct device *dev,
>>    	if (err)
>>    		return err;
>>    
>> -	switch(value) {
>> +	switch (value) {
>>    	case 1: /* manual, percent-based */
>>    		rdev->asic->dpm.fan_ctrl_set_mode(rdev, FDO_PWM_MODE_STATIC);
>>    		break;
>> @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static ssize_t radeon_hwmon_get_pwm1_max(struct device *dev,
>>    					 struct device_attribute *attr,
>>    					 char *buf)
>>    {
>> -	return sprintf(buf, "%i\n", 100); /* pwm uses percent-based fan-control */
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%i\n", 255);
>>    }

This is not a standard name as it is not documented in 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface

Apparently, the pwm value should always have been exposed as 0-255 and I 
screwed it up in nouveau by having it be 0-100...

Maybe we should ask pwm*_max to be defined so as new applications could 
do the right thing while not having nouveau change its ABI. I guess it 
is ok to change it for radeon as there are so few users currently but 
the interface has been in nouveau for multiple years already!



More information about the dri-devel mailing list