[PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos: remove unused 'activated' field from exynos_drm_plane

[Gustavo Padovan]

2015-04-17 Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>:

> Hello Joonyoung,
> 
> On 2015-04-17 08:30, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> >Hi Tobias,
> >
> >On 04/16/2015 04:54 AM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> >>No component of Exynos DRM uses this field. Perhaps it was
> >>once meant to provide more fine-grained information in
> >>addition to the status stored in the 'enabled' field.
> >>
> >>Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>
> >>---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h | 2 --
> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h
> >>b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h
> >>index 6a849cf..4c14a89 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h
> >>@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ extern void exynos4412_qos(u8 tm, u8 ac);
> >>  * @color_key: color key on or off.
> >>  * @local_path: in case of lcd type, local path mode on or off.
> >>  * @transparency: transparency on or off.
> >>- * @activated: activated or not.
> >>  * @enabled: enabled or not.
> >>  * @resume: to resume or not.
> >>  *
> >>@@ -112,7 +111,6 @@ struct exynos_drm_plane {
> >> 	bool color_key:1;
> >> 	bool local_path:1;
> >> 	bool transparency:1;
> >>-	bool activated:1;
> >> 	bool enabled:1;
> >> 	bool resume:1;
> >> };
> >>
> >
> >The following fields also are unused in exynos drm driver,
> >- default win, color_key, local_path, transparency
> Yeah, looks like it. I just stumbled upon 'activated' because I was
> wondering what the difference between 'enabled' and 'activated' was.
> Grepping than revealed that nothing was using that field. I didn't check any
> other fields.
> 
> Also I just noticed that due to how git formats the patches, this one
> doesn't apply to any of Inki's branches (due to the 'extern void
> exynos4412_qos(u8 tm, u8 ac);' line).
> 
> Should I respin this, and if yes, should I also drop the other fields
> mentioned? Question is more directed to Gustavo, since he's cleaning
> 'exynos_drm_plane' anyway.

Let's remove them now, that doesn't affect my work.

	Gustavo