[PATCH 0/1] signals: kill block_all_signals() and unblock_all_signals()
oleg at redhat.com
Thu Aug 27 09:25:05 PDT 2015
On 05/26, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 26 May 2015 at 02:50, Oleg Nesterov <oleg at redhat.com> wrote:
> > AAAAOn 05/25, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Is this functionality still in use/needed?
> > All I can say it doesn't work.
> >> Otherwise we could get rid of block_all_signals() and unpuzzle the signaling
> >> code a bit. :-)
> > Yes. I do not even remember when I reported this the first time. Perhaps
> > more than 10 years ago.
> > See the last attempt in 2011: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/12/263
> > I copied this email below.
> > Dave. Lets finally kill this horror? I am going to send a patch unless
> > you stop me ;)
> There were follow up on that thread 4 years ago, but we are probably
> at the stage where this thing can die,
I tried to kill this horror so many years, and forgot to send the patch
after you finally blessed it ;)
Could you please review?
> I suspect any hw using it has died out, and any new hardware won't be
> doing evil things with drm locks
even if it does, let me repeat that block_all_signals() simply do not
work. At all. if ->notifier() returns 0, this thread will burn CPU until
SIGCONT or SIGKILL. Or it will stop anyway if multi-threaded.
More information about the dri-devel