[PATCH v3 0/14] Add Analogix Core Display Port Driver
Yakir Yang
ykk at rock-chips.com
Sun Aug 30 19:40:38 PDT 2015
Hi Romain,
在 08/30/2015 08:16 PM, Romain Perier 写道:
> Hi,
>
> Could you rebase your serie onto linux-next or 4.2-rc8 ? it does not
> apply here...
Thanks for try to applied, and feel sorry for that failed.
This v3 series was rebased on github.com/torvalds/linux.git, so I should
rebase on kernel/next/linux-next.git when I'm preparing v4 series.
Thanks,
- Yakir
> Regards,
> Romain
>
> 2015-08-21 15:16 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:24:16PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>> On 2015. 8. 21., at PM 7:01, Yakir Yang <ykk at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Jingoo,
>>>>
>>>>> 在 2015/8/21 16:20, Jingoo Han 写道:
>>>>>> On 2015. 8. 19., at PM 11:48, Yakir Yang <ykk at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>>> .....
>>>>>
>>>>>> .../bindings/video/analogix_dp-rockchip.txt | 83 ++
>>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt | 51 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 10 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 10 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 12 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts | 12 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts | 12 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 10 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 12 +-
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 5 +
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c | 1382 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.h | 286 ++++
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_reg.c | 1294 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> .../exynos_dp_reg.h => bridge/analogix_dp_reg.h} | 270 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig | 5 +-
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Makefile | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/analogix_dp-exynos.c | 347 +++++
>>>>> Would you change this file name to "exynos_dp.c"?
>>>> Sorry, I don't think so ;(
>>>>
>>>> I think IP_name+Soc_name would be better in this re-use case.
>>> So? Is there the naming rule such as "IP_name+SoC_name"?
>>>
>>>> Beside I see
>>>> there are lots of driver named with this format in kernel, such as dw_hdmi & dw_mmc
>>> Please look at other dw cases.
>>> For example, look at dw_pcie.
>>>
>>> drivers/pci/host/
>>> pcie-designware.c
>>> pci-spear13xx.c
>>> pci-exynos.c
>>>
>>> In this case, pci-spear13xx.c and pci-exynos.c do not use "IP_name+SoC_name", even though these are dw IPs.
>>>
>>> Also, naming consistency is more important.
>>> Now, Exynos DRM files are using "exynos_drm_" prefix.
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/
>>> exynos_drm_buf.c
>>> exynos_drm_core.c
>>> ....
>>>
>>> However, "analogix_dp-exynos.c" looks very inconsistent.
>>>
>>> If there is no strict naming rule, please use "exynos_dp.c"
>>> or "exynos_drm_dp.c".
>> Exynos DRM maintainers get to pick their filenames, so Yakir, please
>> rename as Jingoo suggested.
>>
>> Even if you didn't the first thing that would go into the Exynos DRM
>> driver tree after this is merged is a rename patch anyway.
>>
>> Thierry
>
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list